“After America, There is No Place to GO.” — Article by Kitty Werthmann

March 12th, 2010

This article came to me via email from my friend Bruce Foster.  It has probably been around the internet many times already, but I personally have never seen it. 

“After America , There is No Place to Go”

The author of this article lives in South Dakota and is very active in attempting to maintain our freedom. I encourage everybody to read this article and pass it along.  I see so many parallels in this country–are we going to sit by and watch it happen?  Spread the word; also contact your congressional reps; vote them out if they don’t do what they should.  If you don’t want to be bothered, then you’re part of the problem! Google Kitty Werthmann and you will see articles and videos.
Kitty Werthmann, author of "After America, There is No Place to Go"

Kitty Werthmann, author of "After America, There is No Place to Go"

America truly is the Greatest Country in the World. Don’t Let Freedom Slip Away

By: Kitty Werthmann

 

What I am about to tell you is something you’ve probably never heard or will ever read in history books.
 
  I believe that I am an eyewitness to history.  I cannot tell you that Hitler took Austria by tanks and guns; it would distort history.  We elected him by a landslide – 98% of the vote.  I’ve never read that in any American publications.  Everyone thinks that Hitler just rolled in with his tanks and took Austria by force.
 
  In 1938, Austria was in deep Depression.  Nearly one-third of our workforce was unemployed.  We had 25% inflation and 25% bank loan interest rates.  Farmers and business people were declaring bankruptcy daily.  Young people were going from house to house begging for food.  Not that they didn’t want to work; there simply weren’t any jobs.
  My mother was a Christian woman and believed in helping people in need.  Every day we cooked a big kettle of soup and baked bread to feed those poor, hungry people – about 30 daily.
 
  The Communist Party and the National Socialist Party were fighting each other.  Blocks and blocks of cities like Vienna , Linz , and Graz were destroyed.  The people became desperate and petitioned the government to let them decide what kind of government they wanted.  We looked to our neighbor on the north, Germany , where Hitler had been in power since 1933.  We had been told that they didn’t have unemployment or crime, and they had a high standard of living.  Nothing was ever said about persecution of any group — Jewish or otherwise.  We were led to believe that everyone was happy.  We wanted the same way of life in Austria . We were promised that a vote for Hitler would mean the end of unemployment and help for the family.  Hitler also said that businesses would be assisted, and farmers would get their farms back.
  Ninety-eight percent of the population voted to annex Austria to Germany and have Hitler for our ruler.
 
  We were overjoyed, and for three days we danced in the streets and had candlelight parades.  The new government opened up big field kitchens and everyone was fed.  After the election, German officials were appointed, and like a miracle, we suddenly had law and order.  Three or four weeks later, everyone was employed.  The government made sure that a lot of work was created through the Public Work Service.  
 

  Hitler decided we should have equal rights for women.  Before this, it was a custom that married Austrian women did not work outside the home.  An able-bodied husband would be looked down on if he couldn’t support his family.  Many women in the teaching profession were elated that they could retain the jobs they previously had been required to give up for marriage.
Hitler Targets Education – Eliminates Religious Instruction for Children:
 
  Our education was nationalized.  I attended a very good public school.  The population was predominantly Catholic, so we had religion in our schools. The day we elected Hitler (March 13, 1938), I walked into my schoolroom to find the crucifix replaced by Hitler’s picture hanging next to a Nazi flag. Our teacher, a very devout woman, stood up and told the class we wouldn’t pray or have religion anymore.  Instead, we sang “Deutschland, Deutschland, Uber Alles,” and had physical education.  Sunday became National Youth Day with compulsory attendance.  Parents were not pleased about the sudden change in curriculum.  They were told that if they did not send us, they would receive a stiff letter of warning the first time.  The second time they would be fined the equivalent of $300, and the third time they would be subject to jail.  The first two hours consisted of political indoctrination.  The rest of the day we had sports.  As time went along, we loved it.  Oh, we had so much fun and got our sports equipment free.  We would go home and gleefully tell our parents about the wonderful time we had.

  My mother was very unhappy.  When the next term started, she took me out of public school and put me in a convent.  I told her she couldn’t do that and she told me that someday when I grew up, I would be grateful.  There was a very good curriculum, but hardly any fun – no sports, and no political indoctrination.  I hated it at first but felt I could tolerate it.  Every once in a while, on holidays, I went home.  I would go back to my old friends and ask what was going on and what they were doing.  Their loose lifestyle was very alarming to me.  They lived without religion.  By that time unwed mothers were glorified for having a baby for Hitler.  It seemed strange to me that our society changed so suddenly.  As time went along, I realized what a great deed my mother did so that I wasn’t exposed to that kind of humanistic philosophy.
 
 
Equal Rights Hits Home:
 
  In 1939, the war started and a food bank was established.  All food was rationed and could only be purchased using food stamps.  At the same time, a full-employment law was passed which meant if you didn’t work, you didn’t get a ration card, and if you didn’t have a card, you starved to death. Women who stayed home to raise their families didn’t have any marketable skills and often had to take jobs more suited for men.  Soon after this, the draft was implemented.  
It was compulsory for young people, male and female, to give one year to the labor corps.  During the day, the girls worked on the farms, and at night they returned to their barracks for military training just like the boys.  They were trained to be anti-aircraft gunners and participated in the signal corps.  After the labor corps, they were not discharged but were used in the front lines.  When I go back to Austria to visit my family and friends, most of these women are emotional cripples because they just were not equipped to handle the horrors of combat.  Three months before I turned 18, I was severely injured in an air raid attack.  I nearly had a leg amputated, so I was spared having to go into the labor corps and into military service.  
 
 
Hitler Restructured the Family Through Daycare:
  
  When the mothers had to go out into the work force, the government immediately established child care centers.  You could take your children ages 4 weeks to school age and leave them there around-the-clock, 7 days a week, under the total care of the government.  The state raised a whole generation of children..  There were no motherly women to take care of the children, just people highly trained in child psychology.  By this time, no one talked about equal rights.  We knew we had been had.  
 
 
 
Health Care and Small Business Suffer Under Government Controls:
 

  Before Hitler, we had very good medical care.  
 
Many American doctors trai
ned at the University of Vienna .  After Hitler, health care was socialized, free for everyone.  Doctors were salaried by the government.  The problem was, since it was free, the people were going to the doctors for everything. When the good doctor arrived at his office at 8 a.m., 40 people were already waiting and, at the same time, the hospitals were full.  If you needed elective surgery, you had to wait a year or two for your turn.
 
  There was no money for research as it was poured into socialized medicine.  Research at the medical schools literally stopped, so the best doctors left Austria and emigrated to other countries.  As for healthcare, our tax rates went up to 80% of our income.  Newlyweds immediately received a $1,000 loan from the government to establish a household.  We had big programs for families.  All day care and education were free.  High schools were taken over by the government and college tuition was subsidized.  Everyone was entitled to free handouts, such as food stamps, clothing, and housing. 

   We had another agency designed to monitor business.  My brother-in-law owned a restaurant that had square tables.  Government officials told him he had to replace them with round tables because people might bump themselves on the corners.  Then they said he had to have additional bathroom facilities. It was just a small dairy business with a snack bar.  He couldn’t meet all the demands.  Soon, he went out of business.  If the government owned the large businesses and not many small ones existed, it could be in control.  We had consumer protection.  We were told how to shop and what to buy.  Free enterprise was essentially abolished.  We had a planning agency specially designed for farmers.  The agents would go to the farms, count the live-stock, then tell the farmers what to produce, and how to produce it.  

 
“Mercy Killing” Redefined:
 
  In 1944, I was a student teacher in a small village in the Alps .  The villagers were surrounded by mountain passes which, in the winter, were closed off with snow, causing people to be isolated.  So people intermarried and offspring were sometimes retarded.  When I arrived, I was told there were 15 mentally retarded adults, but they were all useful and did good manual work.  I knew one, named Vincent, very well.  He was a janitor of the school.  One day I looked out the window and saw Vincent and others getting into a van.  I asked my superior where they were going.  She said to an institution where the State Health Department would teach them a trade, and to read and write.  The families were required to sign papers with a little clause that they could not visit for 6 months.  They were told visits would interfere with the program and might cause homesickness.  As time passed, letters started to dribble back saying these people died a natural, merciful death.  The villagers were not fooled.  We suspected what was happening.  Those people left in excellent physical health and all died within 6 months.  We called this euthanasia. 
 
 
The Final Steps – Gun Laws:
 
   Next came gun registration..  People were getting injured by guns.  Hitler said that the real way to catch criminals (we still had a few) was by matching serial numbers on guns.  Most citizens were law abiding and dutifully marched to the police station to register their firearms.  Not long after-wards, the police said that it was best for everyone to turn in their guns.  The authorities already knew who had them, so it was futile not to comply voluntarily.  No more freedom of speech.  Anyone who said something against the government was taken away.  We knew many people who were arrested, not only Jews, but also priests and ministers who spoke up.

 

 

  Totalitarianism didn’t come quickly, it took 5 years from 1938 until 1943, to realize full dictatorship in Austria .  Had it happened overnight, my countrymen would have fought to the last breath.  Instead, we had creeping gradualism.  Now, our only weapons were broom handles.  The whole idea sounds almost unbelievable that the state, little by little eroded our freedom.

 

 

  After World War II, Russian troops occupied Austria .  Women were raped, preteen to elderly.  The press never wrote about this either.  When the Soviets left in 1955, they took everything that they could, dismantling whole factories in the process.  They sawed down whole orchards of fruit, and what they couldn’t destroy, they burned..  We called it The Burned Earth. Most of the population barricaded themselves in their houses.  Women hid in their cellars for 6 weeks as the troops mobilized.  Those who couldn’t, paid the price.  There is a monument in Vienna today, dedicated to those women who were massacred by the Russians.  This is an eye witness account.

“It’s true..those of us who sailed past the Statue of Liberty came to a country of unbelievable freedom and opportunity.

America Truly is the Greatest Country in the World. Don’t Let Freedom Slip Away

After America , There is No Place to Go”

 

   

 

 

Leaked Documents reveal the Obama Administration’s Intention to Acquire 13 million acres!

March 6th, 2010

The Great Federal Land Grab is already happening.  Leaked documents reveal the Obama administration’s intention to acquire 13 million acres as a means to reduce the Federal deficit.  Let the games begin!

The REALTORS® Land Institute reported in an email today that individual states are beginning to get nervous about President Obama’s underlying intentions regarding oil and gas reserves in their states.  Just as President Clinton created national monuments overnight in the mid 1990’s, President Obama is quite likely gearing up to grab huge parcels of land in the coming months and years. 

Don’t get me wrong.  The Grand Staircase Escalante is one of my favorite places to visit, especially because of its remote, undeveloped character.  However, the use of Federal police powers to grab land from private individuals and from individual states for the purpose of extracting oil & gas under the guise of wildlife preservation is wrong and must be stopped. 

We are looking at the erosion of our States’ rights and the eventual demise of personal liberties. 

Oil and gas rights in the State of Oklahoma were not mentioned in the RLI memo, but the slope is very slippery and it may only be a matter of time before the Federal government aims it’s sites at us.

The Federal Government will have to find a different way to reduce the Federal deficit.

Don’t forget to scroll down to click on links to leaked documents:  1) a leaked U.S. Department of the Interior memo and 2) a letter by Western lawmakers.

Here is the REALTORS® Land Institute memo in it’s entirety:

GOP lawmakers seek to constrain White House on national monuments (03/04/2010)

Efforts to strip the Obama administration’s authority to create new national monuments are gaining momentum in Congress as lawmakers continue to roll out bills aimed at protecting their states from what they view as a White House agenda to tie up large tracts of land.

Montana Rep. Dennis Rehberg (R) this morning became the latest to introduce a bill that would require congressional approval of any executive proposals to designate federal lands in the state as national monuments, according to an aide.

And on Tuesday, Colorado Rep. Doug Lamborn (R) rolled out a nearly identical proposal to protect his state from unilateral designations.

“Colorado has a rich supply of natural energy that if used responsibly can provide high paying jobs and reduce energy costs,” Lamborn said in a statement. “It seems President Obama and [Interior] Secretary Salazar would rather lock up our valuable Western resources than help lower energy costs and create jobs.”

Rehberg and Lamborn joined lawmakers from Utah, Nevada and California who have written nearly identical bills in response to an Interior memo leaked last month identifying 14 sites for potential addition to the National Landscape Conservation System, which includes more than 27 million acres of wilderness, conservation areas, rivers and monuments.

A national monument in Montana’s Northern Prairie would connect 2.5 million acres straddling the Canadian border that would “provide an opportunity to restore prairie wildlife and the possibility of establishing a new bison range,” the memo states. Such a designation would depend on conservation easements, willing sellers and withdrawal from the public domain, according to the document.

In northwest Colorado, the memo identifies the Vermillion Basin, a high desert area that provides critical wintering habitat for big game species and sage grouse, but which is also considered ripe for oil and gas development. The document also discusses the possible purchase of 25,000 acres of patented mining claims in the Alpine Triangle, a 150,000-acre special recreation management area in the San Juan Mountains, at an estimated cost of $37.5 million.

Republican lawmakers say such proposals, along with others covering an estimated 13 million acres in nine states, are evidence that the Obama administration wants to push energy development and other resource-extractive activities off of large swaths of public land. Other states with lands identified in the memo are Arizona, California, Montana, New Mexico, Nevada, Oregon, Utah and Washington.

Rep. Mike Coffman (R), a co-sponsor of the Colorado bill, said the legislation “will help ensure that any decision to further restrict access to valuable natural resources is done so with the full input and knowledge of the people of Colorado.”

More states on the way?

Rep. Jeff Flake of Arizona (R) and Alaska’s Rep. Don Young (R) and Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R) are also considering bills to protect federal lands from executive monument designations, according to aides.

Matthew Specht, Flake’s chief of staff, yesterday confirmed that the congressman plans to introduce legislation that would impose the same restrictions on national monument designations as the other recent bills.

“The impact of these designations in the West is enormous,” said Flake. “There needs to be adequate discussion and debate before the federal government takes the step to designate more land as national monuments.”

Flake and Young were among 16 Western lawmakers who wrote a letter last week to Salazar demanding a complete copy of the leaked memo. The original leaked documents were labeled as pages 15 to 21. The lawmakers also asked for all documents and communications regarding the department’s plan to compile a list of potential designations, including maps and any communications with individuals and groups outside the Interior Department (Greenwire, Feb. 26).

“We were distressed to learn from an internal ‘NOT FOR RELEASE’ document that deliberations regarding potential National Monument designation sites and ‘high priority land-rationalization efforts’ were taking place within the Department of Interior without public knowledge or participation,” the lawmakers wrote.

Interior spokeswoman Kendra Barkoff said the memo was nothing more than a “brainstorming” session and that no maps had been drafted of proposed sites. She said the agency was still reviewing the lawmakers’ letter, but no decision had been made over whether any remaining documents would be turned over by the March 26 deadline called for by the lawmakers.

Calming tensions

Salazar has repeatedly said the agency has “no secret agenda,” and he assured lawmakers again yesterday that the department is under no orders from the White House to designate new national monuments.

“There is no direction from the White House on any of this at the Department of Interior,” he told senators at an Interior budget hearing before the Energy and Natural Resources Committee. “Zero, nada, nothing, OK? It isn’t there.”

But some lawmakers remained skeptical.

Utah Sen. Bob Bennett (R) said he remembered similar guarantees given by Clinton administration officials after the Washington Post published reports indicating the White House was considering designating what would become Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument in 1996.

“[Former Interior Secretary Bruce Babbitt] assured me just as much as you have assured the committee here today that this was just preliminary and that there was no decision about to be made,” Bennett told Salazar.

Less than 48 hours later, Bennett recalled, he learned that President Clinton and Vice President Al Gore were meeting at the Grand Canyon to announce the designation. The Grand Staircase-Escalante monument was created later that day with no federal consultation with local or state officials, Bennett said.

“When you have that kind of experience, you begin to get a little suspicious,” he told Salazar.

Next steps

The five House bills that have been introduced have or will likely be assigned to the Natural Resources Committee, though none contains bipartisan sponsorship. A bill introduced in the Senate by Bennett and fellow Utah Sen. Orrin Hatch (R) was assigned to the chamber’s Energy and Natural Resources Committee.

Utah Rep. Rob Bishop (R), ranking member of the Subcommittee on National Parks, Forests and Public Lands, said it makes sense that other Western states should have the same exemption from unilateral national monument designations as Wyoming was granted in a 1950 amendment to the Antiquities Act.

“If Wyoming is exempt, it makes practical sense to let everybody else be exempted as well,” he said.

But House committee chairman Nick Rahall (D-W.V.) said the Antiquities Act has been an important asset for presidents ever since Theodore Roosevelt used it to protect the Grand Canyon, and that attempts to paint it as a tool for federal land grabs are disingenuous.

“The Antiquities Act only allows designation of land that is already federally owned,” he said in an emailed statement. “These designations should not be taken lightly and should not move forward without public input, but national monuments should not be demonized or mischaracterized just to score some political points.”

Bishop, when asked if he thinks the bills have enough support to pass, demurred. “It is common sense, which means it probably won’t be heard by this Congress,” he said.

Click here to read the leaked Interior memo.

Click here to read the Western lawmakers’ letter.


REALTORS® Land Institute
An affiliate of the NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS®
Toll Free: 800-441-LAND
Fax:  312-329-8633
Email: rli@realtors.org  

Getting Organized — Some Organizational Tips for New Homeowners Regarding Taxes, Insurance, and Record Keeping

March 5th, 2010

Visit houselogic.com for more articles like this.

Copyright 2010 NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS®

Going Green — Green Homeownership and Sustainable Living

March 5th, 2010

Visit houselogic.com for more articles like this.

Copyright 2010 NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS®

Home Repairs to Save on Energy Costs

March 5th, 2010

Visit houselogic.com for more articles like this.

Copyright 2010 NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS®

Tax Credits for Home Remodeling

March 5th, 2010

Visit houselogic.com for more articles like this.

Copyright 2010 NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS®

Essential Home Maintenance and Repair

March 5th, 2010

Visit houselogic.com for more articles like this.

Copyright 2010 NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS®

Getting Ready to Remodel Your Home?

March 5th, 2010

Visit houselogic.com for more articles like this.

Copyright 2010 NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS®

The Oklahoma Chapter of the REALTORS® Land Institute Discusses the New OREC Contracts

March 3rd, 2010

The Oklahoma Chapter of the REALTORS® Land Institute learned about minerals today from knowlegeable oil & gas attorneys.  In the course of the question and answer periods throughout the day, there were many comments made regarding our new statewide Oklahoma real estate contract forms.

There was a consensus that a great deal of unintended negative consequences could result from using “surface only” contract forms when the seller owns and is willing to convey the oil & gas and other minerals.

Using the “surface only” contracts, we would want to cross out “surface rights only” and cross out  “less and except all the oil, gas and other minerals in and under and that may be produced from the Property.”

Then we would have to add language that would make it clear that the buyer was asking for the conveyance of  all of the minerals the Seller owns — if any.  That “if any” carries a great deal of importance.

So here is some workable wording for a supplemental addendum:

This Contract includes the conveyance of any and all rights and appurtenances thereto and in any way belonging to the Seller, including all of Grantor’s right, title, and interest to the oil, gas, and other minerals of any type, including, but not limited to, coal, gold, silver, copper, precious metals, rock, stone, gravel, and mineral substances of any kind, if any, in and under the surface and that may be produced from the Property as well as wind, solar, and surface and subsurface water rights owned by Seller.

Oklahoma REALTORS® Learn about Easements and Minerals

March 3rd, 2010

The Oklahoma Chapter of the REALTORS® Land Institute (RLI) met today at the Greater Tulsa Association of REALTORS®.  Two oil & gas attorneys spoke, addressing the topics of easements and mineral rights respectively.

We learned that in Oklahoma the term “oil & gas and other minerals” does not include minerals such as gold, copper, coal, diamonds etc.  Oil and gas are “fugacious” and the term “other minerals” means minerals that act like oil & gas.  Rocks, stone, and gravel also do not fall within the scope of the term “minerals” in Oklahoma.
I came home and looked up the word “fugacious” at http://M-W.com.  It means “lasting a short time.”  A synonym is “evanescent.”  The etymology of the word is from the Latin “fugere,”  which I think means “to flee.”   This makes sense to me, because it is consistent with what I have learned about reservoir depletion and oil and gas flowing updip. It was therefore recommended to us that we be very specific in our real estate contracts to describe exactly what it is we want our clients to convey or retain.

We also were told that even if a landowner owned let’s say 10 acres in fee simple absolute in the middle of a 640-acre unit, then that landowner could be “pooled.”  I guess that the surrounding leasehold would be draining the reservoir under their land anyway, so you might as well cooperate and sign a lease on your own terms and get a better royalty check.

Moreover, one of the attorneys corrected me by saying that severed minerals are not personal property; rather they are a form of real estate.  That means I will have to correct earlier blogs where I have referred to the severed mineral estate as personal property.  That is a common misconception among REALTORS®.  I stand corrected.